4.4 Article

Phase I/II trial of intravenous recombinant interleukin-2 in HIV-infected children

期刊

AIDS
卷 17, 期 15, 页码 2181-2189

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200310170-00006

关键词

interleukin-2; immunotherapy; HIV infections; pediatrics; cytokines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To define the tolerated dose of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in HIV-infected children (part A), and to determine the safety and immunologic effects of the tolerated rIL-2 dose in a cohort of HIV-infected children (part B). Design: Open-label, dose-escalation. Setting: Multiple center study. Subjects: Twenty HIV-infected children, aged 3-12 years. Intervention: In part A six subjects received 1 x 10(6) IU/m(2) and four subjects received 4 x 10(6) IU/m(2) rIL-2 by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days every 8 weeks for three cycles. In part B 10 different subjects received 1 x 10(6) IU/m(2) for 5 days every 8 weeks for six cycles. Main outcome measures: Toxicity, CD4 cell count and percentage, and viral load. Results: The tolerated dose of rIL-2 was 1 x 10(6) IU/m(2). The most common side effects were fever and vomiting. Of 10 subjects enrolled in part B of the study, five discontinued rIL-2 therapy for a variety of reasons, most related to administration of study drug. Comparable rises in CD4 cell count and percentage were observed in each of the treatment arms. Six cycles of rIL-2 therapy did not appear to be better than three cycles with respect to improvement of CD4 parameters. Transient rises in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were detected in some subjects. Conclusions: These results suggest that rIL-2 therapy can raise CD4 cell counts and percentages in some HIV-infected children, although a high proportion of HIV-infected children may have to discontinue intravenous therapy because of drug- or administration-related toxicity. Controlled trials of rIL-2 in this patient population are warranted. (C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据