4.6 Review

Hydrogenation versus transfer hydrogenation of ketones: Two established ruthenium systems catalyze both

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 9, 期 20, 页码 4954-4967

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200304884

关键词

asymmetric catalysis; homogenous catalysis; ketone hydrogenation; ruthenium; transfer hydrogenation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The established standard ketone hydrogenation (abbreviated HY herein) precatalyst [Ru(Cl)(2)((S)-tolbinap){(S,S)-dpen}] ((S),(S,S)-1) has turned out also to be a precatalyst for ketone transfer hydrogenation (abbreviated TRHY herein) as tested on the substrate acetophenone (3) in iPrOH under standard conditions (45degreesC, 45 bar H-2 or Ar at atmospheric pressure). HY works at a substrate catalyst ratio (s:c) of up to 10(6) and TRHY at s:c < 10(4). Both produce (R)-1-phenylethan-1-ol ((R)-4), but the ee in HY are much higher (78-83 %) than in TRHY (4 - 62 %). In both modes, iPrOk is needed to generate the active catalysts, and the more there is (1 - 4500 equiv), the faster the catalytic reactions. The ee is about constant in HY and diminishes in TRHY as more iPrOK is added. The ketone TRHY precatalyst [RU(Cl)(2)((S,S)-cyP(2)(NH)(2))] ((S,S)-2), established at s:c = 200, has also turned out to be a ketone HY precatalyst at up to s:c = 10(6), again as tested on 3 in iPrOH under standard conditions. The enantioselectivity is opposite in the two modes and only high in TRHY: with (S,S)-2, one obtains (R)-4 in up to 98% ee in TRHY as reported and (S)-4 in 20 25 % ee in HY. iPrOK is again required to generate the active catalysts in both modes, and again, the more there is, the faster the catalytic reactions. The ee in TRHY are only high when 0.5 -1 equivalents iPrOK are used and diminish when more is added, while the (low) ee is again about constant in HY as more iPrOK is added (0-4500 equiv). The new [Ru(H)(Cl)((S,S)-cyP(2)(NH)(2))] isomers (S,S)-9A and (S,S)-9B (mixture, exact structures unknown) are also precatalysts for the TRHY and HY of 3 under the same conditions, and (R)-4 is again produced in TRHY and (S)-4 in HY, but the lower ee shows that in TRHY (S,S)-9A/(S,S)-9B do not lead to the same catalysts as (S,S)-2. In contrast, the ee are in accord with (S,S)-9A/(SS)9 B leading to the same catalysts as (SS)2 in HY. The kinetic rate law for the HY of 3 in iPrOH and in benzene using (S,S)-9A/(S,S)-9B/iPrOK or (S,S)-9A/ (S,S)-9B/tBuOK is consistent with a fast, reversible addition of 3 to a five-coordinate amidohydride (S,S)-11 to give an (S,S)-11-substrate complex, in competition with the rate-determining addition of H-2 to (S,S)-11 to give a dihydride [Ru(H)(2)((S,S)-cyP(2)(NH)(2))] (S,S)-10, which in turn reacts rapidly with 3 to generate (S)-4 and (S,S)-11. The established achiral ketone TRHY precatalyst [Ru(Cl)(2)(ethP(2)(NH)(2))] (12) has turned out to be also a powerful precatalyst for the HY of 3 in iPrOH at s:c = 10(6) and of some other substrates. Response to the presence of iPrOK is as before, except that 12 already functions well without it at up to s:c = 10(6).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据