4.5 Article

OCTOPAMINE AND 5-HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE MEDIATE HEMOCYTIC PHAGOCYTOSIS AND NODULE FORMATION VIA EICOSANOIDS IN THE BEET ARMYWORM, Spodoptera exigua

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/arch.20286

关键词

Arachidonic acid; eicosanoid; octopamine; 5-hydroxytryptamine; monoamine; nodulation; phagocytosis; Spodoptera exigua

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology Evaluation and Planning
  2. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Octopamine and 5-hydrroxytryptamine (5-HT) have been known to mediate cellular immune responses, such as hemocytic phagocytosis and nodule formation, during bacterial invasion in some insects. In addition, eicosanoids also mediate these cellular immune reactions in various insects, resulting in. clearing the bacteria circulating in the hemolymph. This study investigated a hypothesis on signal cross-talk between both types of immune mediators in the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, which had been observed in the effect of eicosanoids on mediating the cellular immune responses. In response to bacterial infection, octopamine or 5-HT markedly enhanced both hemocytic phagocytosis and nodule formal,ion in S. exigua larvae. Their specific antagonists, phentolamine (an octopamine antagonist) or ketanserin (a 5-HT antagonist) suppressed both cellular immune responses of S. exigua. These effects of biogenic monoamines on the immune mediation were expressed through eicosanoids because the inhibitory effects of both antagonists were rescued by the addition of arachidonic acid (a precursor of eicosanoid biosynthesis). Furthermore, the stimulatory effects of both monoamines on the cellular immune responses were significantly by different inhibitors acting at their specific levels of eicosanoid biosynthesis. Taken together, this study suggests that octopamine and 5-HT can mediate hemocytic phagocytosis and nodule formation, through a downstream signal pathway relayed by eicosanoids in S. exigua. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据