4.4 Article

Interaction of cholesterol with a docosahexaenoic acid-containing phosphatidylethanolamine: Trigger for microdomain/raft formation?

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 41, 页码 12028-12037

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi034931+

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01CA57212] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM61070] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6) containing phospholipids have been postulated to be involved in promoting lateral segregation within membranes into cholesterol- (CHOL-) rich and CHOL-poor lipid microdomains. Here we investigated the specific molecular interactions of phospholipid bilayers composed of 1-[H-2(31)]palmitoyl-2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (16:0-22:6PE-d(31)) or 1-[H-2(31)]palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (16:0-18APE-d(31)) with equimolar CHOL using solid-state H-2 NMR spectroscopy and low- and wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD). Moment analysis of 2H NMR spectra obtained as a function of temperature reveals that the main chain melting transition and the lamellar-to-inverted hexagonal (H-11) phase transition of 16:0-22:6PE-d(31) remain in the presence of equimolar CHOL, whereas addition of equimolar CHOL essentially obliterates the gel-to-liquid crystalline transition of 16:0-18:1PE-d(31). H-2 NMR order parameter measurements show that the addition of equimolar CHOL in the lamellar liquid crystalline phase causes a smaller increase in order for the perdeuterated sn-1 chain by 22% for 16:0-22:6PE-d(31) as opposed to 33% for 16:0-18:1PE-d(31). XRD experiments determined markedly lower solubility of 32 +/- 3 mol % for CHOL in 16:0-22:6PE bilayers in contrast to the value of similar to51 mol % for 16:0-18:1PE. Our findings provide further evidence that cholesterol has a low affinity for DHA-containing phospholipids and that this reduced affinity may serve as a mechanism for triggering the formation of lipid microdomains such as rafts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据