4.8 Article

Magnesium tetraarylporphyrin tweezer:: A CD-sensitive host for absolute configurational assignments of α-chiral carboxylic acids

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 125, 期 42, 页码 12914-12927

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja036294g

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 065716-01, GM 34509] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A protocol to determine the absolute configuration of a-chiral carboxylic acids based on a modified circular dichroic (CD) exciton chirality method has been developed. The protocol relies on a host-guest complexation mechanism: the chiral substrates are derivatized to give bifunctional amide conjugates (guests) that form complexes with a dimeric magnesium porphyrin host, Mg-T (T stands fortweezer) that acts as a receptor. The two porphyrins in the complex adopt a preferred helicity dictated by the substituents at the chiral center in accordance with their steric sizes (assigned on the basis of conformational energy A-values) and, consequently, with the absolute configuration of the substrates under investigation. This chiroptical method, verified with a variety of chiral substrates, has been demonstrated to be reliable and generally applicable, including natural products with complex structures. Molecular modeling, NMR, and FTIR experiments of selected host-guest complexes revealed the mode of ligation of the substrates to the magnesium porphyrin species and led to clarification of the structure of the complex. When oxygen functionalities were directly attached to the chiral center, the signs of the CD couplets were opposite to those predicted on the basis of steric size. NMR and molecular modeling experiments indicated that this apparent inconsistency was due to conformational characteristics of the guest molecules. The stereochemical analysis is shown to be a sensitive technique, not only for the determination of absolute configurations of substrates but also for elucidation of their solution conformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据