4.7 Article

Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 plays a pivotal role in angiotensin II - Induced cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 93, 期 9, 页码 874-883

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000100665.67510.F5

关键词

mitogen-activated protein kinase; mice; reactive oxygen species; signal transduction; gene expression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple lines of evidence establish that angiotensin II (Ang II) induces not only hypertension but also directly contributes to cardiac diseases. Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), one of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinases, plays a key role in stress-induced cellular responses. However, nothing is known about the role of ASK1 in cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling in vivo. In this study, by using mice deficient in ASK1 (ASK1(-/-) mice), we investigated the role of ASK1 in cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling induced by Ang II. Left ventricular (LV) ASK1 was activated by Ang II infusion in wild-type mice, which was mediated by angiotensin II type 1 receptor and superoxide. Although Ang II-induced hypertensive effect was comparable to wild-type and ASK1(-/-) mice, LV ASK1 activation by Ang II was not detectable in ASK1(-/-) mice, and p38 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation was lesser in ASK(-/-) mice than in wild-type mice. Elevation of blood pressure by continuous Ang II infusion was comparable between ASK1(-/-) and wild-type mice. However, Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling, including cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, cardiac hypertrophy-related mRNA upregulation, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, interstitial fibrosis, coronary arterial remodeling, and collagen gene upregulation, was significantly attenuated in ASK1(-/-) mice compared with wild-type mice. These results provided the first in vivo evidence that ASK1 is the critical signaling molecule for Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling. Thus, ASK1 is proposed to be a potential therapeutic target for cardiac diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据