4.4 Article

Hysteroscopic metroplasty: reproductive outcome in relation to septum size

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
卷 289, 期 3, 页码 671-676

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-3003-9

关键词

Endoscopic surgery; Hysteroscopic metroplasty; Large partial uterine septum; Small partial uterine septum; Uterine anomalies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our aim is to determine if the reproductive performance after hysteroscopic resection of partial uterine septum was related to septum size. The retrospective and comparative cohort study was conducted in a University-affiliated Hospital. A cohort of 112 non-parous patients was treated for a partial uterine septum. The septum size was evaluated by hysteroscopy and transvaginal 3-dimensional ultrasound. The patients were stratified into two groups: group 1 (85 women) with small partial uterine septum (a parts per thousand currency sign2.5 cm) and group 2 (27 women) with large partial uterine septum (> 2.5 cm). They were also divided according to their obstetrics history: 39 infertile women and 73 aborters. All underwent hysteroscopic metroplasty with a resectoscope with an equatorial semicircular loop cutting 0A degrees with monopolar energy. All septa were almost completely removed and no complications occurred. The two groups of patients with small (group 1) and large (group 2) partial uterine septum were compared in the terms of reproductive history and performance before and after surgery. In the overall population the reproductive performance after surgery is greatly improved. No significant differences in reproductive performance were evident between patients with small and large partial uterine septa. The reproductive performance was also similar in infertile patients and in aborters. This study demonstrates that hysteroscopic metroplasty in cases of partial uterine septum and infertility significantly improves the reproductive performance irrespectively of septum size and that reproductive performance is independent from previous obstetrics history.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据