4.1 Review

The UK Nest Record Scheme: its value for science and conservation

期刊

BIRD STUDY
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 254-270

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00063650309461318

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capsule A review of its methodology, analytical procedures and uses. Aims To provide a comprehensive review of the UK Nest Record Scheme (NRS), its methodology and value to science and conservation. \Methods We reviewed the history of the development and current methodology used in the analysis of NRS data in the scientific literature and unpublished documents and from our personal knowledge. Results The British Trust for Ornithology's (BTO's) NRS is the largest, longest running and most highly computerized such scheme in the world. Advanced and efficient techniques of data gathering, data capture and analysis are used. It was founded in 1939 to provide information on the breeding biology of birds, but has since developed into a key component of the overall monitoring strategy for birds in the UK. A range of specialized analytical methods is available for NRS data and potential biases need careful treatment. More than 250 scientific publications have used NRS data to describe aspects of basic breeding biology and performance, to study the population dynamics of bird populations and to investigate the demographic causes of bird population declines in the UK. Conclusions Extensive long-term monitoring schemes, such as the NRS, that collate large historical data sets will become increasingly valuable for monitoring the impact of environmental change. While aspects of the NRS, its recording methods, data capture and analysis can be developed further, the scheme will continue to advance our understanding of both the impacts of new environmental stresses in the UK and the effectiveness of new conservation measures in the wider countryside. This has been amply demonstrated by its use for exploring the impacts of global climate change on the UK's avifauna.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据