4.5 Article

Microglial activation with atypical proinflammatory cytokine expression in a rat model of Parkinson's disease

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 2731-2742

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2003.03014.x

关键词

interleukin-1; neurodegeneration; RT-PCR; tumour necrosis factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microglial activation has been associated with the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD). Among the many components of this reaction, cytokines have been proposed as candidates to mediate neurodegenerative or neuroprotective effects. We investigated the interleukin-1 system and tumour necrosis factor-alpha mRNA and protein levels at different time intervals in the subacute intrastriatal 6-hydroxydopamine rat model of PD, in parallel with the inflammatory response. Immunohistochemistry showed that microglial cells were activated from days 6-30 postlesion in the substantia nigra pars compacta. This microglial activation was accompanied by an atypical proinflammatory cytokine production: Interleukin-1alpha and beta mRNAs were found to be elevated 30 days post-6-hydroxydopamine injection (2- and 16-fold, respectively), but no induction for interleukin-1alpha or beta at the protein level was detected by ELISA. As a control, a classical proinflammatory stimulus, namely endotoxin, was capable of inducing these cytokines at similar mRNA levels but also at the protein level. In addition, tumour necrosis factor-alpha mRNA was hardly or not detected in the substantia nigra at any time point studied. Our data point out a tight control of key proinflammatory cytokine production in our model of PD. This work supports the notion that chronic neuronal death per se does not induce secretion of these proinflammatory cytokines but that an additional stimulus is necessary to stimulate proinflammatory cytokine production. The production of proinflammatory cytokines from primed microglia may in turn modulate disease progression as has been recently proposed in a model of prion disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据