4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Use of thiazolidinediones and risk of heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes - A retrospective cohort study

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 26, 期 11, 页码 2983-2989

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.2983

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - To compare the incidence of heart failure in individuals with type 2 diabetes receiving thiazolidinediones (TZD) versus other oral antihyperglycemic agents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a health insurance claims database. The study sample included patients with type 2 diabetes who received an oral antihyperglycemic agent between January 1995 and March 2001. Those with any claims for TZDs were designated exposed, and each was compared with five randomly selected unexposed patients. Those with diagnoses of heart failure or who received digoxin or a diuretic in the year before their index date were excluded. The primary measure of interest was incidence of heart failure, which was defined as a hospitalization or outpatient visit with a diagnosis of heart failure. RESULTS - TZD patients (n = 5,441) were younger than control subjects (n = 28,103) but more likely to have coronary artery disease of diabetes complications, receive ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, metformin, or insulin, and have undergone HbA(1c) tests or eye exams; they also had more comorbidities and higher costs (all P < 0.05). However, TZD use was predictive. of heart failure even after controlling for these variables (hazard ratio = 1.7, P < 0.001). Adjusted incidence of heart failure at 40 months was 8.2% for TZD patients and 5.3% for control subjects. CONCLUSIONS - The results of this observational the risk of heart failure. Physicians should use TZDs with caution in patients with heart failure, remain vigilant for manifestations of heart failure in those receiving these drugs (especially patients with cardiovasculopathy), and consider alternate therapies for patients who develop symptoms of heart failure, such as shortness of breath.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据