4.7 Article

Inhibition of human mast cell proliferation and survival by tamoxifen in association with ion channel modulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 112, 期 5, 页码 965-972

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.07.004

关键词

human; mast cells; ion channels; cellular proliferation; tamoxifen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Human lung mast cells (HLMCs) and the human mast cell line HMC-1 express a strongly outwardly rectifying Cl- current characteristic of that carried by the voltage-dependent Cl- channel CIC-5. A similar but distinct current has been implicated in the control of cell proliferation in astrocytes. Objective: In this study, we have examined the effects of the Cl- channel blocker tamoxifen on ion channel activity and cell proliferation in both HMC-1 and HLMCs. Methods: We used the whole-cell patch-clamp technique to characterize macroscopic ion currents in mast cells before and after addition of tamoxifen. HMC-1 proliferation was assessed by incorporation of tritiated thymidine, HLMC proliferation was determined by counting cells in long-term culture, and cell viability was assessed by annexin V binding and propidium iodide uptake. Results: In HMC-1, tamoxifen reduced the outward Cl- current at +130 mV by 73% +/- 9% at a concentration of 3 mumol/L and simultaneously opened a novel inwardly rectifying nonselective cation current with a mean inward current of 153 18 pA at -130 mV. Tamoxifen produced a dose-dependent inhibition of HMC-1 proliferation (90.3% +/- 4.0% inhibition at 30 mumol/L) without altering cell viability. Tamoxifen inhibited the outward CIC-5-like current in HLMCs, did not open an inward current, and produced a dose-dependent inhibition of HLMC proliferation in long-term culture. Conclusion: Tamoxifen inhibits HMC proliferation, possibly through ion channel modulation. This suggests that tamoxifen might be useful in the treatment of mast-cell-mediated diseases, including mastocytosis, asthma, and pulmonary fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据