4.5 Article

Intra- and inter-specific competition between seedlings of Acacia etbaica and a perennial grass (Hyparrenia hirta)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 441-451

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00052-1

关键词

Acacia etbaica; Hyparrenia hirta; inter-specific competition; intra-specific competition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intra- and inter-specific competition between seedlings of Acacia etbaica Schweinf. and the grass Hyparrenia hirta (L.) Stapf. was studied to evaluate the influence of the perennial grass on the establishment of the tree seedlings. The experiment was conducted using a replacement series in which plants were grown in a greenhouse at an overall density of six individuals per pot, providing combinations of the two species from 0:6 and 6:0. Indices of intra- and interspecific competition, relative crowding coefficients and relative yield totals (RYTs) were calculated from the dry weight data. For both shoots and roots, the crowding coefficient of Hyparrenia towards Acacia was five- to ten-fold that of Acacia towards Hyparrenia, which indicated a high competitive strength for the grass species. RYT values of the two species averaged 1.25, indicating some degree of resource complimentarity. Both species had comparable intra-specific competition based on shoot yield. However, based on the root yield, intra-specific competition of Hyparrenia was slightly lower than that of Acacia. Inter-specific competition of Hyparrenia on the root yield of Acacia was more than five times greater than vice versa. With more crowding, shoot/root ratio decreased more in Hyparrenia than in Acacia for pure stands as well as for mixtures which indicated that Hyparrenia could adjust biomass allocation. In general, the results indicated that Hyparrenia was competitively aggressive towards Acacia and may inhibit the growth of tree seedlings when the latter are planted within the grass community. Implications of the findings in terms of land reclamation efforts are discussed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据