4.5 Article

Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 1011-1017

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00098-6

关键词

fracture repair; stimulation; biomechanics; histology; animal model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study tested the hypothesis that interfragmentary axial movement of transverse diaphyseal osteotomies would result in improved fracture healing compared to interfragmentary shear movement. Ten skeletally mature merino sheep underwent a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy of the right tibia, stabilized by external fixation with ail interfragrilentary gap of 3 mill. A custom made external fixator allowed either pure axial (n = 5) or pure shear movement (n = 5) of 1.5 mm amplitude during locomotion by the animals. The movement of the osteotomy gap was monitored weekly in two sheep by ail extensometer temporarily attached to the fixator. After 8 weeks the sheep were killed, and healing of the osteotomies was evaluated by radiography, biomechanical testing, and undecalcified histology. Shear movement considerably delayed the healing of diaphyseal osteotomies. Bridging of the osteotomy fragments occurred in all osteotomies in the axial group (100%), while in the shear group only three osteotomies (60%) were partially bridged. Peripheral callus formation in the shear group was reduced by 36% compared to the axial group (p < 0.05). In the axial group bone formation was considerably larger at the peripheral callus and in between the osteotomy gaps but not in the intramedullary area. The larger peripheral callus and excess in bone tissue at the level of the gap resulted in a more than three times larger mechanical rigidity for the axial than for the shear group (p < 0.05). In summary, fixation that allows excessive shear movement significantly delayed the healing of diaphyseal osteotomies compared to healing under axial movement of the same magnitude. (C) 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据