4.5 Article

Chemokine modulation of high-conductance Ca2+-sensitive K+ currents in microglia from human hippocampi

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 2893-2898

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2003.03021.x

关键词

ameboid; glial cells; human tissue; ion channels; MIP1-alpha; patch clamp

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [P01-NS39092-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During acute pathological processes, microglia transform into an activated state characterized by a defined morphology and current profile, and are recruited to injury sites by chemokines. No information is available on the ion channels and the mode of action of chemokines in microglia in brain slices from humans with a chronic pathology. Thus, patch-clamp recordings of microglia were performed in hippocampal slices from seven patients who underwent surgery for pharmaco-resistant epilepsy. Cells were identified as microglia by positive labelling with fluorescein-conjugated tomato lectin before recording. All the recorded cells had an ameboid morphology characteristic of activated microglia. However, they had a high input resistance (3.6 GOmega), a zero-current resting potential of -16 mV, and lacked Na+ currents, inwardly rectifying and delayed rectifying K+ currents such as non-activated microglia. Importantly, recorded cells expressed Ca2+-sensitive outward currents that activated at 0 mV with non-buffered intracellular Ca2+ and were sensitive to 1 mM tetraethylammonium (TEA). The estimated single-channel conductances were 187 pS in cell-attached and 149 pS in outside-out patches, similar to those of high-conductance Ca2+-dependent K+ channels. The chemokine MIP1-alpha increased whole-cell outward current amplitudes measured at +60 mV by a factor of 3.3. Thus, microglia in hippocampi from epileptic patients express high-conductance Ca2+-dependent K+ channels that are modulated by the chemokine MIP1-alpha. This modulation may contribute to the migratory effect of MIP1-alpha on microglia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据