4.4 Article

Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman's syndrome

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
卷 281, 期 2, 页码 355-361

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-1117-x

关键词

Infertility; Asherman's syndrome; Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis; Reproductive outcome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman's syndrome. This was a retrospective clinical analysis of 89 patients who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis by monopolar electrode knife. A second-look office hysteroscopy was performed in all cases after 2 months. On second-look hysteroscopy, 12 patients showed reformation of adhesions and needed a repeat procedure. The mean age of the patient was 28.4 years. In the majority (64%) of patients, the possible cause of Asherman's syndrome was previous curettage on gravid uterus. The overall conception rate was 40.4% after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. The mean conception time after surgery was 12.8 months. There was no conception in patients who needed repeat adhesiolysis. The conception rate was higher (58%) in mild Asherman's syndrome compared to 30% conception rate in moderate and 33.3% conception rate in severe cases. There was no significant association between conception rate and preoperative menstrual pattern. There was significant higher likelihood of conception rate (44.3%) in those who continued to have improved menstrual pattern compared to only 10% likelihood of conception in those who continued to have amenorrhea after adhesiolysis. The live birth rate was 86.1% and miscarriage rate was 11.1%. Cumulative pregnancy rate showed that 97.2% patients conceived within 24 months. There was increased incidence (43.8%) of cesarean section. Four (12.5%) patients had postpartum hemorrhage for adherent placenta. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman's syndrome is a safe and effective method of choice for restoring menstrual function and fertility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据