4.4 Article

Comparing GnRH agonist long protocol and gnrh antagonist protocol in outcome the first cycle of ART

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
卷 281, 期 1, 页码 81-85

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-1073-5

关键词

GnRH antagonist; GnRH agonist; Pregnancy rate; Assisted reproductive technology; Ovarian stimulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This prospective study evaluated the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in comparison with the GnRH agonist protocol in the first cycle of assisted reproductive technique (ART). We randomized 235 patients undergoing ART for the first time. The first group was stimulated with a standard long protocol and the second group stimulated with GnRH antagonis. There was no statistically significant difference in the age, infertility cause, basal FSH, BMI, the number of oocytes retrieved, number of M2 oocytes, embryo obtained and endometrial thickness between the two groups. But Serum estradiol, consumption of gonadotropins and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were significantly lower in the antagonist protocol. Cancellation rate of embryo transfer due to poor-quality embryo in the antagonist protocol was higher, but it was not significant. There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy between the two groups. GnRH-antagonist is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated alternative to agonist in the first cycle of ART.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据