4.7 Article

Outcomes and prognostic factors in 267 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong

期刊

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 139, 期 9, 页码 715-723

出版社

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-9-200311040-00005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has become a global public health emergency. Objective: To evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with SARS in Hong Kong and to identify predictors of mortality. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Quarantine hospital for patients with SARS in Hong Kong. Patients: 267 consecutive patients hospitalized from 26 February to 31 March 2003 for probable or confirmed SARS. Measurements: Clinical, laboratory, and radiographic measures; 3-month mortality rate. Results: According to our case definition, there were 227 cases of confirmed SARS and 40 cases of probable SARS. Common presenting symptoms were fever (99% of patients), chills (74%), malaise (63%), and myalgia (50%). Laboratory findings included lymphopenia (73%), thrombocytopenia (50%), hyponatremia (60%), and elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase (47%) and C-reactive protein (75%). During hospitalization, incidence of diarrhea (53%), anemia (53%), and acute renal failure (6%) increased. Sixty-nine patients (26%) required intensive care because of respiratory failure. The 3-month mortality rate was 12% (95% Cl, 8% to 16%). Factors contributing to mortality were respiratory failure, acute renal failure, and nosocomial sepsis. On multivariate Cox regression, age older than 60 years (relative risk, 5.10 [Cl, 2.30 to 11.31]; P < 0.001) and lactate dehydrogenase level greater than 3.8 mu kat/L at presentation (relative risk, 2.20 [Cl, 1.03 to 4.71]; P = 0.04) were independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion: Because of the longer follow-up period in our cohort, the mortality rate in these patients is higher than rates reported in previous studies. Advanced age and high lactate dehydrogenase level at presentation predict mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据