4.7 Article

Loss of E-cadherin expression correlates with poor differentiation and invasion into a acent organs in gastric adenocarcinomas

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 201, 期 1, 页码 97-106

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.07.007

关键词

gastric cancer; E-cadherin; differentiation; invasion; prognosis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perturbation in E-cadherin expression leads to loss of cellular adhesion with possible consequence of cellular transformation and tumor progression. The aims of this study were to determine E-cadherin expression in each subtype of gastric cancer classified by different classification systems, and to investigate the role of E-cadherin in cell differentiation, cancer invasion and metastasis. Expression of E-cadherin was analyzed in 84 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry and correlated with clinicopahotlogical parameters. Our results showed loss of E-cadherin expression in 0% (0/3), 20.0% (9/45), 48% (15/31), 100% (3/3) and 100% (2/2) of papillary, tubular, poorly differentiated, signet-ring cell, and mucinous adenocarcinoma by Japanese histological classification. The reduction of E-cadherin expression was inversely correlated with the grade of differentiation. According to the histological classification of Lauren and Ming, the frequency of lost E-cadherin expression was higher in diffuse type (65%) and infiltrative type (64%) gastric cancer than in intestinal type (20%, P < 0.001) and expanding type cancer (22%, P < 0.001), respectively. The loss of E-cadherin expression was significantly associated with tumor invasion (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a borderline association between the loss of E-cadherin expression and poor survival (P = 0.109). These data demonstrated a striking correlation between E-cadherin expression and the differentiation of gastric carcinoma. The loss of E-cadherin expression may contribute to gastric cancer invasion to adjacent organs. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据