4.8 Article

Aquaporin-4 square array assembly: Opposing actions of M1 and M23 isoforms

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2235843100

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY011239, EY-11239] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R37 HL048268, HL-48268, HL33991, R01 HL033991, R01 HL048268] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS044010, R56 NS044395, NS-44010, NS-38121, NS-44395, R01 NS038121, R01 NS044395] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osmotic homeostasis in the brain involves movement of water through aquaporin-4 (AQP4) membrane channels. Perivascular astrocyte end-feet contain distinctive orthogonal lattices (square arrays) assembled from 4- to 6-nm intramembrane particles (IMPs) corresponding to individual AQP4 tetramers. Two isoforms of AQP4 result from translation initiation at methionine residues M1 and M23, but no functional differences are known. In this study, Chinese hamster ovary cells were transfected with M1, M23, or M1 +M23 isoforms, and AQP4 expression was confirmed by immunoblotting, immunocytochemistry, and immunogold labeling. Square array organization was examined by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. In astrocyte end-feet, >90% of 4- to 6-nm IMPs were found in square arrays, with 65% in arrays of 13-30 IMPs. In cells transfected with M23, 95% of 4- to 6-nm IMPs were in large assemblies (rafts), 85% of which contained >100 IMPs. However, in M1 cells, >95% of 4-to 6-nm IMPs were present as singlets, with <5% in incipient arrays of 2-12 IMPs. In M1 +M23 cells, 4- to 6-nm IMPs were in arrays of intermediate sizes, resembling square arrays in astrocytes. Structural cross-bridges of 1 x 2 nm linked >90% of IMPs in M23 arrays (approximate to 1,000 cross-bridges per mum(2)) but were rarely seen in M1 cells. These studies show that M23 and M1 isoforms have opposing effects on intramembrane organization of AQP4: M23 forms large square arrays with abundant cross-bridges; M1 restricts square array assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据