4.7 Article

Altered depression-related behaviors and functional changes in the dorsal raphe nucleus of serotonin transporter-deficient mice

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 54, 期 10, 页码 960-971

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00696-6

关键词

5HTT; serotonin transporter; knockout; antidepressant; open field; learned helplessness; novelty suppressed feeding; tail suspension; immunohistochemistry; forced swim; shock avoidance; electrophysiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: As a key regulator of serotonergic activity and target of many antidepressant treatments, the serotonin transporter (SERT) represents a potential mediator of anxiety- and depression-related behaviors. Using mice lacking the SERT (SERT KO), we examined the role of SERT function in anxiety- and depression-related behaviors and serotonergic neuron function. Methods: Serotonin transporter knockout mice were evaluated in paradigms designed to assess anxiety-, depression-, and stress-related behaviors. Dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) function was assessed by quantitative serotonergic cell counting and extracellular electrical recording of neuronal firing properties. Results: Serotonin transporter knockout mice showed an increase in latency to feed in a novel situation, more immobility in a forced swim, increased escape latency in a shock escape paradigm, and decreased immobility in tail suspension. No differences in anxiety-related behaviors were seen in the open field and the elevated plus maze. Serotonin transporter knockout mice exhibit a 50% reduction in serotonergic cell number and a fourfold decrease in firing rate in the DRN. Conclusions: Developmental loss of SERT produces altered behaviors in models of depression that are generally opposite to those produced by antidepressant treatment. The reduced serotonergic cell number and firing rate in the DRN of adult SERT KO mice suggest a mechanism for these altered behaviors. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54: 960-971 (C) 2003 Society of Biological Psychiatry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据