4.5 Review

Elastic resistance training to increase muscle strength in elderly: A systematic review with meta-analysis

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
卷 57, 期 1, 页码 8-15

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2013.03.002

关键词

Resistance training; Exercise movement techniques; Aged; Systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analyze the efficiency of training programs with progressive elastic resistance on muscle strength in elderly 'healthy' and 'not healthy'. It was performed a systematic review in relevant databases to identify controlled clinical trials with outcomes from parameters of muscle strength. Two independent reviewers decided about the inclusion criteria, data extraction and evaluation of methodological quality of the articles. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for relevant outcomes and pooled using a random effects model. Among the 11 studies whose effect sizes were used in the meta-analysis, there were 834 individuals between the ages of 60 and 79. The resistance training with elastic bands showed strong effects on muscle strength in healthy elderly (SMD = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.71) and with some functional incapacity (SMD = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.82, 1.19), and a moderate effect on muscle strength in elderly patients with pathology (SMD = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.96). There was little information available about the training intensity. The training with elastic resistance proved to be effective for improving muscle strength in 'healthy' and 'not healthy' elderly. Our results suggest that training with elastic resistance is most effective in 'healthy' subjects and with functional limitations, and less effective in subjects with some kind of disorders. To establish dose-response relations from different intensities of training on muscle strength in the elderly, new studies are needed to identify reliable and objective methods of evaluation of muscle strength using elastic materials directly. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据