4.7 Article

Antiangiogenetic therapy with pioglitazone, rofecoxib, and metronomic trofosfamide in patients with advanced malignant vascular tumors

期刊

CANCER
卷 98, 期 10, 页码 2251-2256

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11775

关键词

malignant vascular tumor; angiosarcoma; antiangiogenetic; palliative treatment; biomodulating drugs

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Systemic therapy options for patients with advanced angiosarcomas are limited, and their prognosis is poor. The idea of angiostatic therapy following the paradigm of metronomic dosed chemotherapeutics combined with proapoptotic biomodulators had not been considered previously in these patients. Therefore, in a pilot study, the efficacy of metronomically scheduled, low-dose trofosfamide in combination with the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, pioglitazone, and the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, rofecoxib, was evaluated in patients with advanced vascular malignancies. METHODS. Six patients with advanced and pretreated but progressive, malignant vascular tumors (5 angiosarcomas and 1 hemangioendothelioma) received a combination of pioglitazone (45 mg per day orally) plus rofecoxib (25 mg per day orally) and, after 14 days, trofosfamide (3 X 50 mg per day orally). The therapy was administered continuously until progression was observed. If necessary, doses were modified according to side effects. RESULTS. Two patients responded with complete remission of disease, one patient responded with partial remission, and three patients achieved stabilization of disease (no change). The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (range, 2-15 months). Side effects generally were mild (World Health Organization Grade 1-2). Hospitalization was not necessary. CONCLUSIONS. This new triple combination of low-dose metronomic trofosfamide, pioglitazone, and rofecoxib may represent a feasible new alternative in the palliative treatment of patients with advanced malignant vascular tumors. (C) 2003 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据