4.5 Article

Molecular dynamics simulations, thermodynamic analysis, and experimental study of phase stability of zinc sulfide nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 107, 期 47, 页码 13051-13060

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp036108t

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comprehensive study of the phase stability of ZnS nanoparticles was carried out using combined molecular dynamics simulations, thermodynamic analysis, and experimental investigations. Average surface energies of the sphalerite and wurtzite phases of zinc sulfide (ZnS) were calculated to be 0.86 and 0.57 J/m(2), respectively, using results from dynamics simulations of free faces of ZnS crystals at 300 K. Thermodynamic analysis, making use of the surface energy data, shows that smaller wurtzite nanoparticles are more thermodynamically stable than sphalerite. When the average particle size is similar to7 nm, the temperature for the transformation from sphalerite to wurtzite is 25 degreesC, dramatically lower than that observed in bulk material (similar to1020 degreesC at I bar). The transformation from 3-nm sphalerite to wurtzite was simulated, and the activation energy was found to be only similar to5 U/mol. The very small activation energy may imply a different mechanism for the phase transformation in very small ZnS nanoparticles. Results of molecular dynamics simulations show that nanocrystalline sphalerite becomes more stable than wurtzite when sufficient water is adsorbed. Experimentally, when samples of synthetic similar to3-nm ZnS were heated in a vacuum over the range 350-750 degreesC, sphalerite transformed to wurtzite. However, there was no obvious conversion of sphalerite to wurtzite when samples were heated in air at 350 degreesC, probably due to the effect of chemisorbed water. The experimental data are consistent with the results of the thermodynamic analysis and molecular dynamic simulations, which indicate size dependence of ZnS phase stability and stabilization of sphalerite nanoparticles by water adsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据