4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Tailpipe, resuspended road dust, and brake-wear emission factors from on-road vehicles

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 37, 期 37, 页码 5283-5293

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.05.005

关键词

urban air pollution; particulate matter; source attribution; chemical mass balance; scanning electron microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intensive mass and chemical measurements were performed at roadside locations in Reno, Nevada, and Durham/Research Triangle Park), North Carolina to derive tailpipe, resuspended road dust, and brake-wear emission factors from in-use vehicles. Continuous particulate matter (PM) data were utilized to derive total emission factors while integrated PM data were used to attribute the calculated emission factors to different mechanisms using chemical mass balance receptor modeling and scanning electron microscopy techniques. Resuspended road dust and tailpipe emissions were found to be the dominant mechanisms that contribute significantly to the total PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors, respectively. Small contributions from brake-wear were observed at locations where strong braking occurs, but no tirewear was seen at any sampling location. PM10 emission rates from light-duty spark ignition (LDSI) vehicles ranged from 40 to 780mg/km, 10 to 70mg/km, and 0 to 80mg/km per vehicle for road dust, tailpipe, and brake-wear, respectively. PM10 emission rates from heavy-duty vehicles ranged from 230 to 7800mg/km, 60 to 570mg/km, and 0 to 610mg/km per vehicle for road dust, tailpipe, and brake-wear, respectively. PM2.5 emission rates from LDSI vehicles ranged from 2 to 25mg/km, 10 to 50mg/km, and 0 to 5mg/km per vehicle for road dust, tailpipe, and brake-wear, respectively. PM2.5 emission rates from heavy-duty vehicles ranged from 15 to 300 mg/km, 60 to 480 mg/km, and 0 to 15mg/km per vehicle for road dust, tailpipe, and brake-wear, respectively. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据