4.0 Article

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Family-Based Treatment With Adolescent-Focused Individual Therapy for Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 67, 期 10, 页码 1025-1032

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.128

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-MH-070621, R01-MH-070620]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Evidence-based treatment trials for adolescents with anorexia nervosa are few. Objective: To evaluate the relative efficacy of family-based treatment (FBT) and adolescent-focused individual therapy (AFT) for adolescents with anorexia nervosa in full remission. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Stanford University and The University of Chicago (April 2005 until March 2009). Participants: One hundred twenty-one participants, aged 12 through 18 years, with DSM-IV diagnosis of anorexia nervosa excluding the amenorrhea requirement. Intervention: Twenty-four outpatient hours of treatment over 12 months of FBI or AFT. Participants were assessed at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and 6 months' and 12 months' follow-up posttreatment. Main Outcome Measures: Full remission from anorexia nervosa defined as normal weight (95% of expected for sex, age, and height) and mean global Eating Disorder Examination score within 1 SD of published means. Secondary outcome measures included partial remission rates (>85% of expected weight for height plus those who were in full remission) and changes in body mass index percentile and eating-related psychopathology. Results: There were no differences in full remission between treatments at EOT. However, at both the 6- and 12-month follow-up, FBT was significantly superior to AFT on this measure. Family-based treatment was significantly superior for partial remission at EOT but not at follow-up. In addition, body mass index percentile at EOT was significantly superior for FBT, but this effect was not found at follow-up. Participants in FBT also had greater changes in Eating Disorder Examination score at EOT than those in AFT, but there were no differences at follow-up. Conclusion: Although both treatments led to considerable improvement and were similarly effective in producing full remission at EOT, FBT was more effective in facilitating full remission at both follow-up points.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据