4.7 Article

The B → πK puzzle and its relation to rare B and K decays

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 45-54

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s2003-01379-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The standard-model interpretation of the ratios of charged and neutral B-->piK rates, R-c and R-n, respectively, points towards a puzzling picture. Since these observables are affected significantly by colour-allowed electroweak (EW) penguins, this B --> piK puzzle could be a manifestation of new physics in the EW penguin sector. Performing the analysis in the R-n- R-c plane, which is very suitable for monitoring various effects, we demonstrate that we may, in fact, move straightforwardly to the experimental region in this plane through an enhancement of the relevant EW penguin parameter q. We derive analytical bounds for q in terms of a quantity L, which measures the violation of the Lipkin sum rule, and point out that strong phases around 90degrees are favoured by the data, in contrast to QCD factorisation. The B --> piK modes imply a correlation between q and the angle gamma that, in the limit of negligible rescattering effects and colour-suppressed EW penguins, depends only on the value of L. Concentrating on a minimal flavour-violating new-physics scenario with enhanced Z(0) penguins, we find that the current experimental values on B --> X-s mu(+)mu(-) require roughly L less than or equal to 1.8. As the B --> piK data give L = 5.7 +/- 2.4, L has either to move to smaller values once the B --> piK data improve or new sources of flavour and CP violation are needed. In turn, the enhanced values of L seen in the B-->piK data could be accompanied by enhanced branching ratios for the rare decays K+ --> pi(+) nu(nu) over bar, K-L --> pi(0) e(+)e(-), B --> X(s)nu(nu) over bar and B-s,B-d --> mu(+)mu(-). Most interesting turns out to be the correlation between the B-->piK modes and BR (K+ --> pi(+) nu(nu) over bar, with the latter depending approximately on a single scaling variable L = L . (\V-ub/V-cb\/0.086)(2.3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据