4.0 Article

Prediction of Psychosis in Adolescents and Young Adults at High Risk Results From the Prospective European Prediction of Psychosis Study

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 241-251

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.206

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [QLG4CT-2001-01081]
  2. Social Insurance Institution of Finland
  3. Medical Faculty of Cologne (Koln Fortune Program)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Indicated prevention is currently regarded as the most promising strategy to attenuate, delay, or even avert psychosis. Existing criteria need improvement in terms of specificity and individual risk assessment to allow for better targeted and earlier interventions. Objective: To develop a differential predictive clinical model of transition to first-episode psychosis. Design: Prospective multicenter, naturalistic field study with a total follow-up time of 18 months. Setting: Six early-detection outpatient centers in Germany, Finland, the Netherlands, and England. Participants: Two hundred forty-five help-seeking patients in a putatively prodromal state of psychosis according to either ultra-high-risk (UHR) criteria or the basic symptom-based criterion cognitive disturbances (COGDIS). Main Outcome Measure: Incidence of transition to psychosis. Results: At 18-month follow-up, the incidence rate for transition to psychosis was 19%. Combining UHR and COGDIS yielded the best sensitivity. A prediction model was developed and included positive symptoms, bizarre thinking, sleep disturbances, a schizotypal disorder, level of functioning in the past year, and years of education. With a positive likelihood ratio of 19.9, an area under the curve of 80.8%, and a positive predictive value of 83.3%, diagnostic accuracy was excellent. A 4-level prognostic index further classifying the general risk of the whole sample predicted instantaneous incidence rates of up to 85% and allowed for an estimation of time to transition. Conclusions: The prediction model identified an increased risk of psychosis with appropriate prognostic accuracy in our sample. A 2-step risk assessment is proposed, with UHR and cognitive disturbance criteria serving as first-step criteria for general risk and the prognostic index as a second-step tool for further risk classification of each patient. This strategy will allow clinicians to target preventive measures and will support efforts to unveil the biological and environmental mechanisms underlying progression to psychosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据