4.5 Article

Molecular responses of human muscle to eccentric exercise

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 2485-2494

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01161.2002

关键词

muscle damage; c-fos; lipocortin II; immediate early genes; expression profiling

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [5 R21 AR-048318] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the effect of eccentric exercise on the transcriptome of skeletal muscle in three male human volunteers who performed 300 concentric contractions with one leg and 300 eccentric contractions with the opposite leg. Vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were taken from both legs at 4-8 h after exercise, and expression was profiled by using 12,000 gene Affymetrix U95Av2 microarrays. We found a high concordance of expression responses to eccentric contractions between our human and rat data from a previous study (Chen YW, Nader GA, Baar KR, Fedele MJ, Hoffman EP, and Esser KA. J Physiol 545: 27-41, 2002) (similar to50% of gene expression changes shared between species). Potential human-specific changes included greater inflammatory responses [chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2, C/EBP delta, and IL-1 receptor] and vascular remodeling (tenascin C and lipocortin II). Induction of c-fos and lipocortin II were confirmed at the protein level, with c-fos localized to myofiber nuclei and lipocortin II to intramuscular capillaries. We also confirmed the eccentric-induced expression of six transcripts by quantitative RT-PCR (cardiac ankyrin-repeated protein, chemokine ligand 2, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein delta, IL-1 receptor, tenascin C, and cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61). These data provide the first characterization of the transcriptional response of skeletal muscle to eccentric exercise in humans and represent a preliminary step in understanding the molecular processes underlying muscle remodeling (including a new focus on rapid changes in the capillary bed) and inflammatory responses after damaging lengthening contractions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据