4.5 Article

Angiogenesis, thrombogenesis, endothelial dysfunction and angiographic severity of coronary artery disease

期刊

HEART
卷 89, 期 12, 页码 1411-1415

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heart.89.12.1411

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Thrombogenesis, angiogenesis, and endothelial damage/dysfunction are components in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Objective: To investigate the relation of these variables to atherosclerotic disease severity and the possible interrelations between the three. Methods: 111 patients attending for coronary angiography were studied ( 85 male, 26 female; mean (SD) age, 61.6 (10.0) years). Plasma concentrations of von Willebrand factor (vWf, a marker of endothelial damage/dysfunction), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, associated with angiogenesis), soluble VEGF receptor Flt-1 (sFlt-1), and tissue factor (TF, a key component of coagulation) were measured by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Following angiography, disease severity was assessed by the number of coronary vessels diseased (> 50% stenosis) and by a coronary atheroma score. Results: All indices were raised in the patients compared with 34 healthy controls except sFlt-1, which was lower in the patients. No significant correlations were found between the coronary atheroma score and values of vWf ( Spearman correlations: r = 0.21, p = 0.83), VEGF ( r = 0.11, p = 0.27), or TF ( r = 20.04, p = 0.68). However, there was an inverse correlation between plasma sFlt-1 and coronary atheroma score ( r = 20.19, p = 0.049). The number of vessels diseased had no relation to any marker. Correlations were found between TF and VEGF ( r = 0.25, p = 0.008) and between TF and sFlt-1 ( r = 0.42, p< 0.001) in the patients. Conclusions: Despite evidence of abnormal angiogenesis ( VEGF and sFlt-1), thrombogenesis ( TF), and endothelial damage/dysfunction ( vWf) in the patients with coronary artery disease, there was no correlation between VEGF, sFlt-1, vWf, or TF and angiographically defined disease severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据