4.6 Article

Fluorocarbons facilitate lung recruitment

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 2297-2302

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1881-1

关键词

lung recruitment; surface tension; fluorocarbon; lung volume

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. 'Open the lung and keep it open' is increasingly accepted as a fundamental principle for mechanical ventilation. However, it is sometimes very difficult, or impossible, to recruit the diseased lung. We questioned whether one could facilitate recruitment by using a low dose of fluorocarbon in a model previously shown to be non-recruitable by conventional sustained inflation maneuvers. Design and setting. Experimental prospective study in a university laboratory. Animals and interventions. Nine saline-lavaged rabbits subjected to prolonged large tidal volume mechanical ventilation to establish significant lung injury were randomly allocated to two groups: control [High Frequency Oscillation (HFO) alone: n=4] or 1 ml/kg fluorocarbon (FC) treated (HFO/FC: n=5) for 2+1 h (experiment 1). An additional four similarly prepared animals were treated by single-lung instillation of 0.5 ml/kg dose of fluorocarbon and underwent serial computerized tomography scans at a series of predetermined step-wise pressure increase in both lungs (experiment 2). Measurements and results. In experiment 1 there was a very significant improvement in oxygenation in HFO/FC group (PaO2 increased from 108 mmHg to 424+/-81 mmHg; P<0.05) while there was no significant change in the control group. In experiment 2 lung volumes were determined using three-dimensional reconstruction. The lung having fluorocarbon showed a 2.4-fold increase in lung volume at inflation pressure of 15 cmH(2)O compared to the lung without fluorocarbon. Conclusions. We propose that the low equilibrium surface tension and positive spreading coefficient of fluorocarbon facilitates lung recruitment by ungluing adherent surfaces in this model of lung injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据