4.6 Article

Predictors of mortality in α1-antitrypsin deficiency

期刊

THORAX
卷 58, 期 12, 页码 1020-1026

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thorax.58.12.1020

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Lung density measurements by computed tomography have previously been found to be a more sensitive indicator of disease progression in emphysema of alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency than lung function measurements. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive potential of several parameters, including CT scanning, for mortality in patients with severe alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency. Methods: Over a 5 year period, 256 patients with alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency (PiZ phenotype) were assessed, of whom 254 underwent lung function testing and 197 had thoracic CT scans. Lung function, CT scans, health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ), and other clinical data of survivors and non-survivors were compared and these parameters were applied to survival analyses. Results: There were 22 deaths in this patient cohort, 10 of which were classified as respiratory'' deaths. Baseline lung function parameters ( forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO)), and CT scores were significantly lower in the non-survivors than in the survivors. 170 of the 256 patients had complete data for entry into multiple regression analyses ( Cox proportional hazards model). In the univariate analysis, upper zone expiratory scan had the best association with all cause ( p = 0.001) and respiratory mortality (p< 0.001), whereas FEV1 ( p = 0.158 all cause, 0.015 respiratory) and KCO ( p = 0.002 all cause, 0.012 respiratory) had poorer associations with mortality. Only age gave further independent predictive information regarding all cause or respiratory mortality when the CT scan was entered into the survival analyses. Conclusions: CT scanning predicts respiratory and all cause mortality in alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency and appears to be superior to lung function parameters, especially FEV1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据