4.2 Article

Modification of patients ' endogenous bacterial flora during hospitalization in a large teaching hospital in Naples

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 568-573

出版社

E I F T SRL
DOI: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.6.568

关键词

nosocomial infection; bacterial resistance; surgical prophylaxis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing attention addressed to methicillin-resistant staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and Extended Spectrum beta-Lactamases (ESbetaL)producing enterobacteria is due to their etiologic role especially in nosocomial infections. In March 2001 we started an 8-month microbiological prospective surveillance of patients in the General Surgery, Orthopedic and Obstetric & Gynecology wards of the Azienda Universitaria Policlinico, 2nd University of Naples, Italy, to monitor the possible changes in endogenous flora during patients' hospital stay and the possible emergence of bacterial resistance. Data concerning antibiotic surgical prophylaxis (antimicrobial agent and duration) and length of hospitalization (pre- and post-surgery) were also collected. All patients underwent a microbiological screening by culturing nasal, pharyngeal and rectal swabs performed at admission and during hospitalization. Overall, 526 nasal swabs, 506 pharyngeal swabs and 482 rectal swabs were performed. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci were isolated from nasal swabs at admission in 2.1% of patients and in 7.5% of patients during hospitalization (day-14). VRE and ESbetaL-producing strains were isolated from rectal swabs in 1.9 and 4.7% of patients, respectively, with no change during hospital stay. Nasal and pharyngeal flora significantly changed after 7-14 days of hospitalization, Gram-negative microorganisms being isolated more frequently following hospitalization. The authors conclude that excessive hospital stay duration, along with the inappropriate duration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis could be important causes of bacterial flora modification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据