4.4 Article

Interpretation of radioactive marker measurements to evaluate compaction in the Northern Adriatic gas fields

期刊

SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 401-411

出版社

SOC PETROLEUM ENG
DOI: 10.2118/79470-PA

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The radioactive marker technique (RMT) appears to be a promising tool to evaluate the in-situ uniaxial vertical compressibility c(M) of deep producing gas/oil reservoirs. However, when the field consists of multipay layers with the porous-medium heterogeneity scale smaller than the marker spacing (10.5 m), great care must be exercised in the interpretation of an RMT survey. If the monitored depth interval incorporates thin clayey layers or the measurement is made in an active pumping well, c(M) can be grossly underestimated. Moreover, rock may expand, with the expansion correctly recorded by RMT. In the present paper, a set of RMT measurements made by Eni-E&P over the past decade in three deep boreholes of the Northern Adriatic basin are simulated with the aid of a 3D poroelastic model solved by finite elements (FEs). Use is made of the much detailed lithostratigraphies of the test holes and the c(M) constitutive equation derived from a previous statistical analysis of the marker data. The modeling results show that the measurements also can be reproduced satisfactorily from a quantitative viewpoint, and they indicate that an efficient marker installation requires that the monitored depth interval be made mostly from an entirely depleted sandy unit, with the markers placed possibly far from a producing well and approximately 10.5 m apart (i.e., the distance between the gamma ray detectors that monitor the marker position). The c(M) constitutive law used in the numerical analysis is realistically accurate from 2500 to 3000 m depth, while it appears to be underestimated by a factor of 2 between 800 and 1500 in. The measured expansions allow for the assessment of the reservoir c(M) under unloading conditions. This turns out to be 2.5 times smaller than c(M) in virgin loading conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据