4.6 Article

Structural evolution of the Tethyan sedimentary sequence in the Annapurna area, central Nepal Himalaya

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 307-+

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00066-X

关键词

annapurna detachment; lupra fault; thakkhola graben; Tethyan sedimentary sequence; palinspastic restoration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Tethyan sedimentary sequence of central Nepal has been affected by three phases of folding (D-1, D-2, and D-4) with contrasting vergence, interspersed by two major extensional events (D-3 and D-5). The north-verging second phase folds (F-2) are the dominant deformation features preserved in the studied area. These D2 structures indicate a vertical structural zonation that is interpreted to mark a preserved D-2 strain gradient increasing with depth, to a presumed north-verging decollement plane at an approximate depth of 10 km. Palinspastic bedlength restoration of the sequence implies a minimum 43% shortening, and a minimum 150% vertical thickening due to D-2 deformation. The D-4 event overprints the D-3 Annapurna detachment, and manifests itself as post-peak metamorphic south-verging kink folds and spaced crenulation cleavage. In the structurally lowest level observed, D-4 is associated with thrust-sense meter-scale fault zones. The youngest extensional event (D-5) marks the initiation and eventual southward propagation of the Thakkhola graben. A newly named northeast-dipping normal fault, the Lupra fault, is described. In the early stages of extension, the Lupra fault may have acted as a southern termination of the graben system, dropping down Cretaceous rocks and high-level structural features in its hanging wall. It is suggested that, as the extension progressed southward, the Lupra fault was itself down-faulted in the graben, and the extent of the Thakkhola graben reached the present position of the Annapurna detachment. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据