4.5 Article

Acute neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 717-723

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00019052-200312000-00012

关键词

management; spinal cord injury; traumatic brain injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This review discusses some of the recent advances and current controversies in the acute clinical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI). Recent findings Several key risk factors for adverse prognosis in TBI have been identified, including female sex. In the management of intracranial hypertension antibiotic impregnated intraventricular catheters have been found to reduce the risk for infection, and new studies have examined the roles of mannitol, hyperventilation, and hypothermia. Moderate hypothermia has also been found to improve outcome. Hyperoxia is now being explored as a treatment option for improving brain metabolism in TBI. That acute SCI continues to be a challenging diagnosis is supported by a recent study that showed that 9.1 % of SCIs are missed initially. The diagnosis and management of spinal instability has been studied in different patient groups. In SCI without radiographic abnormality, the presence of normal magnetic resonance imaging findings was associated with a good prognosis. New studies in the field of early decompression and the prevention of thromboembolism in SCI have also been published. Guidelines for the management of acute SCI recommend methylprednisolone and GM-1 ganglioside only as options. Summary In neurotrauma some established treatments have been reexamined and their efficacy proven, whereas others that were once considered the standard of care in SCI, such as methylprednisolone, have been questioned. Large multicenter trials are needed to assess treatments such as early decompression in SCI and decompressive craniectomy in TBI. A truly effective neuroprotective therapy in neurotrauma remains elusive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据