4.4 Article

Roles of ischemia and hypoxia and the molecular pathogenesis of post-burn cardiac shock

期刊

BURNS
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 828-833

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0305-4179(03)00204-3

关键词

burn ischemia and hypoxia; cardiac shocks; NF-kappa B; MPO; TNF alpha mRNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the roles of ischemia and hypoxia in the development of post-burn cardiac shock and its molecular pathogenesis. Methods: One hundred and fifty healthy adult Wistar rats were divided into the control group and burn group inflicted with 30% total body surface area third degree burn. Groups were processed at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h post-burn. Myocardial contractile function, myocardial microvascular permeability, volume of regional myocardial blood flow, levels of myocardial myosin light chain 1 (CM-LC1), myocardial NF-kappaB (nuclear factor kappa B) activity, MPO (myeloperoxidase), TNFalpha (tumor necrosis factor alpha) mRNA expression and levels of myocardial TNFalpha were measured. Main results: Myocardial microvascular permeability began to rise at I h post-burn and was still rising at 24 h (2.1 times as hi-h as that of the control group); the volume of regional myocardial blood flow fell significantly and remained at a level markedly lower than that in the control group; CM-LC1 also rose significantly and reached a level 18.6 times as high as that in the control group; myocardial NF-kappaB activity and TNFa mRNA expression were significantly promoted; elevation of levels of myocardial TNFalpha and MPO activity occurred; cardiac mechanic parameters including LVSP, +/-dp/dt max significantly decreased while LVEDP increased. Conclusion: The findings of the present study suggest severe myocardial damage due to ischemia and hypoxia following burns; promotion of myocardial NF-kappaB activity and TNFalpha mRNA expression in myocardium may be an important factor in the development of post-burn cardiac shock. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd and ISBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据