4.4 Article

Practical aspects of fertility in poultry

期刊

WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 441-446

出版社

WORLDS POULTRY SCI ASSOC
DOI: 10.1079/WPS20030027

关键词

fertility; reproductive season; reproduction; sperm storage; semen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Birds, reptiles and insects (e.g. Hymenoptera) share fundamental similarities in their reproductive strategies due to the presence, in the female tract, of specialized sites in which spermatozoa may reside for prolonged periods upon a single mating. In avian species, two distinct storage sites are present, one located in the utero-vaginal junction and the other in the lower portion of the infundibulum. At both sites, spermatozoa are stored in sperm storage tubules (SSTs) which are discrete, generally non-branched invaginations of the luminal epithelium (see review by Bakst et al., 1994). The SSTs located in the uterovaginal junction are considered as the main site of residence of spermatozoa upon their deposition in the lower portion of the vagina. The fertilizing potential of females along the reproductive season is at first dependent on their ability to store and maintain adequate populations of spermatozoa in their SST in order to repeatedly provide the site of fertilization with sufficient numbers of fit spermatozoa after each ovulation. As a consequence in poultry species, eggs from females with prolonged sperm storage potential have also a natural tendency to maintain optimal fertility rates for prolonged periods. This situation may be highly desirable to sustain high fertility in the case of partial failure of the males during the season. This review is an attempt to address the main intrinsic and extrinsic factors capable of favouring or altering fertility in poultry species. Unfortunately, most of the information available is obtained from two species, namely the domestic fowl and turkey, which, in certain circumstances, may not reveal enough to pinpoint the controlling factors of fertility in other poultry species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据