4.7 Article

Cardiac hypertrophy is associated with decreased eNOS expression in angiotensin AT2 receptor-deficient mice

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 1177-1182

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000100445.80029.8E

关键词

myocardial infarction; cryoinjury; animals, transgenic; mice; nitric oxide synthase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiotensin II receptors play an essential role in cardiovascular physiology and disease. The significance of angiotensin type II ( AT(2)) receptors in cardiac disease still remains elusive. Thus, we tested in gene- targeted mice whether AT(2) receptors modulate cardiac function and remodeling after experimental myocardial injury. To generate myocardial infarcts of reproducible size, a cryolesion was generated at the free wall of the left ventricle of wild- type mice ( Agtr2 +/ Y) and mice carrying a deletion of the AT(2) receptor gene ( Agtr2-/ Y). Postinjury remodeling was followed up for 4 weeks after cryoinjury. The cryoprocedure led to an increased heart weight/ body weight ratio and heart weight/ tibia length ratio in AT(2)- deficient mice compared with control mice. Morphometric analysis revealed a significant increase in myocyte cross- sectional area after cardiac injury ( infarct vs sham Agtr2 +/ Y, + 53%; vs Agtr2-/ Y, + 95%). Expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase ( eNOS) was significantly lower in hearts from Agtr2-/ Y than from Agtr2 +/ Y mice. eNOS downregulation was accompanied by a decrease in cardiac cGMP levels in Agtr2-/ Y mice. In isolated murine cardiomyocytes, angiotensin II induced eNOS expression through AT(2) receptors, and inhibition of NO production by N-G- nitro- L- arginine methyl ester abolished the antihypertrophic effect of AT(2) on cardiac myocytes. Our results demonstrate in a genetic mouse model that angiotensin II AT(2) receptors exert an antihypertrophic effect in cardiac remodeling after myocardial cryoinjury and link the expression of cardiac eNOS to AT(2) receptor activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据