4.7 Article

Idebenone treatment fails to slow cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 61, 期 11, 页码 1498-1502

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000096376.03678.C1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG10483, U19 AG010483] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the effect of idebenone on the rate of decline in Alzheimer's disease ( AD). Methods: A 1- year, multicenter, double- blind, placebo- controlled, randomized trial was conducted. Subjects were over age 50 with a diagnosis of probable AD and had Mini- Mental State Examination ( MMSE) scores between 12 and 25. Subjects were treated with idebenone 120, 240, or 360 mg tid, each of which was compared with placebo. Primary outcome measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subcomponent ( ADAS- Cog) and a Clinical Global Impression of Change ( CGIC). Secondary outcome measures included measurements of activities of daily living, the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale, and the MMSE. Results: Five hundred thirty- six subjects were enrolled and randomized to the four groups. Except for a slight difference in age, there were no differences in patient characteristics at baseline. For the primary outcome measures, there were no significant overall differences between the treatment groups in the prespecified four- group design. In an exploratory two- group analysis comparing all three treated groups combined with placebo, drug- treated patients performed better on the ADAS- Cog in both the intent- to- treat ( ITT) and completers analyses. There were no differences in the CGIC scores for the ITT or completers analyses in either the four- group or the two- group analyses. There were no overall differences on any of the secondary outcome measures in any of the analyses. Conclusion: Idebenone failed to slow cognitive decline in AD that was of sufficient magnitude to be clinically significant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据