4.7 Article

Effects of large-scale changes in land cover on the discharge of the Tocantins River, Southeastern Amazonia

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 283, 期 1-4, 页码 206-217

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00267-1

关键词

large-scale hydrology; change in land cover; climate variability; hydroclimatology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies that relate changes in land cover with changes in river discharge at the small scale (< 1 km(2)) are abundant. These studies generally indicate that deforestation causes an increase in the annual mean discharge. However, previous studies that evaluated the effects of changes in land cover in larger river basins (> 100 km(2)) usually have not found similar relationships. Here we analyse a 50-year long time series of discharge of a tropical river, the Tocantins River at Porto Nacional (175,360 km(2)), as well as precipitation over this drainage area, during a period where substantial changes in land cover occurred in the basin (1949-1998). Based on agricultural census data, we estimate that, in 1960, about 30% of the basin was used for agriculture. Previous work indicates that by 1995, agriculture had increased substantially, with about 49% of the basin land used as cropland and pastures. Initially, we compare one period with little changes in land cover (period 1-1949-1968) with another with more intense changes in land cover (period 2-1979-1998). Our analysis indicates that, while precipitation over the basin is not statistically different between period 1 and period 2 (alpha = 0.05), annual mean discharge in period 2 is 24% greater than in period 1 (P < 0.02), and the high-flow season discharge is greater by 28% (P < 0.01). Further analyses present additional evidence that the change in vegetation cover altered the hydrological response of this region. As the pressure for changes in land cover in that region continue to increase, one can expect important further changes in the hydrological regime of the Tocantins River. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据