4.7 Article

Highly damped quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 68, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.124018

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivated by recent suggestions that highly damped black hole quasinormal modes (QNM's) may provide a link between classical general relativity and quantum gravity, we present an extensive computation of highly damped QNM's of Kerr black holes. We perform the computation using two independent numerical codes based on Leaver's continued fraction method. We do not limit our attention to gravitational modes, thus filling some gaps in the existing literature. As already observed by Berti and Kokkotas, the frequency of gravitational modes with l=m=2 tends to omega(R)=2Omega, Omega being the angular velocity of the black hole horizon. We show that, if Hod's conjecture is valid, this asymptotic behavior is related to reversible black hole transformations. Other highly damped modes with m>0 that we computed do not show a similar behavior. The real part of modes with l=2 and m<0 seems to asymptotically approach a constant value omega(R)similar or equal to-mpi, pisimilar or equal to0.12 being (almost) independent of a. For any perturbing field, trajectories in the complex plane of QNM's with m=0 show a spiraling behavior, similar to the one observed for Reissner-Nordstrom black holes. Finally, for any perturbing field, the asymptotic separation in the imaginary part of consecutive modes with m>0 is given by 2piT(H) (T-H being the black hole temperature). We conjecture that for all values of l and m>0 there is an infinity of modes tending to the critical frequency for superradiance (omega(R)=m) in the extremal limit. Finally, we study in some detail modes branching off the so-called algebraically special frequency of Schwarzschild black holes. For the first time we find numerically that QNM multiplets emerge from the algebraically special Schwarzschild modes, confirming a recent speculation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据