4.5 Article

A simplified method for inorganic phosphate determination and its application for phosphate analysis in enzyme assays

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 323, 期 2, 页码 180-187

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2003.08.024

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simplified method for inorganic phosphate determination has been developed. The method is sensitive, easy, economic, and applicable for estimation of phosphate released in both enzymatic and nonenzymatic reactions. A mixture of hydrazine sulfate and ascorbic acid was used as the reducing agent and the conditions for the development of the molybdenum blue color were optimized. Thus in the 4.0 ml assay system, 0.4 ml of the reducing agent solution containing 20 mg each of hydrazine sulfate and ascorbic acid per milliliter of 1.0 N H2SO4 gave a rapid optimum color development with absorption maximum at 820 nm. Color development showed a linear relationship up to 10 mug Pi concentration. Thus the method has a 2.5 x higher range of Pi estimation than that of the Bartlett method. The molar extinction coefficient at 820nm was higher than that obtained in the Bartlett procedure. Also the molybdenum blue color formed was stable up to 24 h. Under the standard assay conditions, interference from acid-labile phosphate as in the case of Na+,K+ ATPase was at the minimum. The applicability of the method for assay of microsomal Na+,K+ ATPase and glucose-6-phosphatase was checked in microassays (final volume 0.1 ml) in comparison to the conventional procedures which use 3-4 times higher volumes. Likewise the applicability of the method for phospholipid analysis was compared with that of the conventional Bartlett method. Under both test systems the results obtained by the micromethod were identical to those obtained by the conventional methods. In general the method, which rapidly produces quantitatively molybdenum blue color, not only is rapid economical, and convenient but also has wide applicability. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据