4.7 Article

The multidrug resistance-associated protein 3 (MRP3) is associated with a poor outcome in childhood ALL and may account for the worse prognosis in male patients and T-cell immunophenotype

期刊

BLOOD
卷 102, 期 13, 页码 4493-4498

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3461

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The family of multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs) belongs to the superfamily of adenosine triphosphate-binding-cassette (ABC) transporters, which have the ability to function as outward pumps for chemotherapeutic drugs and therefore might be involved in drug resistance. In this study the expression of the MRP2, MRP3, MRP4, MRP5, and SMRP genes was measured using TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 103 children with previously untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (precursor B-cell ALL [B-ALL], In = 71; T-cell ALL [T-ALL], In = 32). All 5 genes were expressed with a great variability. Only MRP3 expression was associated with a significantly worse prognosis (P =.008). The median expression of MRP3 was 10-fold higher in T-ALL than in precursor B-ALL (P <.001) and 4-fold higher in male patients than in female patients (P <.001). The prognostic impact of MRP3 was independent of immunophenotype or sex. Higher levels of MRP3 were found in patients with a poor in vivo response to prednisone, but this could not be confirmed in an independent case-control study (40 patients) for prednisone response. In healthy donors, the median expression of MRP4 was 4-fold higher in bone marrow and 8-fold higher in CD34(+) stem cells compared with peripheral blood (P =.002). Our results suggest that MRP3 is involved in drug resistance in childhood ALL. It therefore represents an interesting target to overcome multidrug resistance. High levels of MRP3 could possibly be the reason for the poorer prognosis of male patients or patients who have TALL. Similar to other members of the family of ABC transporters, MRP4 seems to be a marker for immature stem cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据