4.6 Article

IL-8-mediated cell migration in endothelial cells depends on cathepsin B activity and transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 171, 期 12, 页码 6714-6722

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.12.6714

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL61731, HL55657] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs) express both the CXCR1 and the CXCR2, but cell migration is almost entirely mediated by the CXCR2. Similarly, NIH 3T3 cells transfected with the CXCR2 migrated toward IL-8, whereas CXCR1-transfected cells failed to do so. This situation differs from that seen in leukocytes, where chemotaxis is primarily a function of the CXCR1. To define signal transduction pathways that explain this difference in behavior, various inhibitors were used to block cell migration. Apart from inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, which blocked migration in all cases, inhibition of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor blocked IL-8-mediated cell migration in HMECs and in CXCR2-transfected NIH 3T3 cells, but not in RBL2H3 cells, which do not express an EGFR. Blocking Abs against the EGFR or against heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor similarly blocked IL-8-mediated cell migration and in vitro tubulogenesis in HMECs. Furthermore, inhibition of the EGFR also attenuated focus formation in NIH 3T3 expressing the CXCR2. Immunoprecipitations of the EGFR in HMECs and in NIH 3T3 cells expressing the CXCR2 confirmed that the EGFR was phosphorylated following stimulation with IL-8. However, in contrast to previous reports, e.g., for the thrombin receptor, inhibition of matrix metalloproteases blocked IL-8-mediated cell migration only partially, whereas it was ablated by inhibition of cathepsin B. These results indicate that IL-8-induced transactivation of the EGFR is mediated by the CXCR2 and involves cathepsin B, and that this pathway is important for the migratory and tumorigenic effects of IL-8.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据