4.4 Article

Response of the left anterior descending coronary artery to Acetylcholine in patients with chest pain and angiographically normal coronary arteries

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 92, 期 12, 页码 1394-1398

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.08.043

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because atherosclerotic plaque burden affects the likelihood of plaque rupture, it is important to determine the presence and extent of atherosclerotic plaque. We hypothesized that endothelial dysfunction becomes more prominent with development of atherosclerotic plaque; therefore, we examined the relation between coronary endothelial dysfunction and the presence of atherosclerotic plaque. In 36 patients with normal coronary arteries, acetylcholine (ACh; 3 and 30 mug/min) and nitroglycerin were infused into the left coronary ostium, and the diameter of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery was quantitatively measured in response to each drug. The plaque burden was measured in the same segment using intravascular ultrasonography. The plaque burden was 31.2 +/- 2.1% and correlated inversely with changes in coronary diameter induced by 3 mug/min of ACh (r = -0.754, p <0.0001), 30 mug/min of ACh (r = -0.552, p = 0.0005), and nitroglycerin (r = -0.531, p = 0.0009). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the change in coronary diameter induced by 3 mug/min of ACh was associated with plaque burden, independent of the effects of nitroglycerin-induced dilation. Receiver-operating characteristics analysis demonstrated that a cut-off value for the change in coronary diameter induced by 3 mug/min of ACh for predicting a plaque burden of >30% was 0%, with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.95. These findings suggest that coronary endothelial dysfunction is correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden, indicating that atherosclerotic plaque may be detected based on coronary endothelial function as assessed by low-dose ACh infusion. (C) 2003 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据