4.8 Article

Preparation and adsorption properties for thiophene of nanostructured W2C on ultrahigh-surface-area carbon materials

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 25, 页码 4846-4853

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm034399c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured tungsten carbides on ultrahigh-surface-area carbon (>3000 m(2)/g), a kind of novel carbon material with uniform pore distribution, have been prepared by carbothermal reduction, carbothermal hydrogen reduction, and metal-promoted carbothermal hydrogen reduction under mild conditions. The resulting carbides have been characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, temperature-programmed reduction-mass spectroscopy, and N-2 physico-sorption. The adsorption properties of thiophene on nanostructured tungsten carbides on ultrahigh-surface-area carbon were also investigated in a fixed-bed reactor. The results show that nanostructured W2C particles of about 10 nm on ultrahigh-surface-area carbon material can be synthesized by carbothermal reduction and carbothermal hydrogen reduction at 850 degreesC. Nanostructured W2C has also been obtained by metal Ni-promoted carbothermal hydrogen reduction even at 650 degreesC. The results also show that carbothermal hydrogen reduction can form tungsten carbides under relatively mild conditions compared to carbothermal reduction, and addition of Ni further decreases formation temperatures of tungsten carbides. Tungsten carbides formation involves the sequence WO3 --> WOx (0 < x < 3) --> W --> W2C --> WC. The results on adsorption show that W2C/HSAC has superior properties for removal of sulfur-containing compounds in fuel oil and the adsorption properties can be recovered after H-2 reduction at 800 degreesC. The adsorption capacity of the samples on thiophene is in the following order: W2C/HSAC > W/HSAC > WC/HSAC much greater than HSAC. Nanostructured W2C/HSAC may be of great potential in ultra-deep removal of sulfur-containing compounds in fuel oil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据