4.7 Article

Chest pain relief by nitroglycerin does not predict active coronary artery disease

期刊

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 139, 期 12, 页码 979-986

出版社

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-12-200312160-00007

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [T32-HLO7227-26] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The belief that chest pain relief with nitroglycerin Indicates the presence of active coronary artery disease is common. However, this hypothesis has not been tested. Objective: To define the diagnostic and prognostic value of chest pain relief with nitroglycerin. Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: urban community teaching hospital. Patients: 459 consecutive patients with chest pain admitted through the emergency department who received nitroglycerin from emergency services personnel or an emergency department nurse. Follow-up was obtained by telephone contact at 4 months. Measurements: Chest pain relief was defined as a decrease of at least 50% in patients' self-reported pain within 5 minutes of the Initial dose of sublingual or spray nitroglycerin. Active coronary artery disease was defined as any elevated serum enzyme levels, coronary angiography demonstrating a 70% or greater stenosis, or a positive exercise test result. Results: Nitroglycerin relieved chest pain in 39% of patients (181 of 459). In patients with active coronary artery disease as the likely cause of their chest pain, 35% (49 of 141) had chest pain relief with nitroglycerin. In contrast, in patients without active coronary artery disease, 41% (113 of 275) had chest pain relief (P > 0.2). Four-month clinical outcomes were similar in patients with or without chest pain relief with nitroglycerin (P > 0.2). Conclusions: These data suggest that, in a general population admitted for chest pain, relief of pain after nitroglycerin treatment does not predict active coronary artery disease and should not be used to guide diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据