4.7 Article

Weekly cycle of NO2 by GOME measurements:: a signature of anthropogenic sources

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 2225-2232

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-3-2225-2003

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen oxides ( NO+ NO2 = NOx and reservoir species) are important trace gases in the troposphere with impact on human health, atmospheric chemistry and climate. Besides natural sources ( lightning, soil emissions) and biomass burning, fossil fuel combustion is estimated to be responsible for about 50% of the total production of NOx. Since human activity in industrialized countries largely follows a seven- day cycle, fossil fuel combustion is expected to be reduced during weekends. This weekend effect is well known from local, ground based measurements, but has never been analysed on a global scale before. The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment ( GOME) on board the ESA- satellite ERS- 2 allows measurements of NO2 column densities. By estimating and subtracting the stratospheric column, and considering radiative transfer, vertical column densities ( VCD) of tropospheric NO2 can be determined ( e. g. Leue et al., 2001). We demonstrate the statistical analysis of weekly cycles of tropospheric NO2 VCDs for different regions of the world. In the cycles of the industrialized regions and cities in the US, Europe and Japan a clear Sunday minimum of tropospheric NO2 VCD can be seen. Sunday NO2 VCDs are about 25 - 50% lower than working day levels. Metropolitan areas with other religious and cultural backgrounds ( Jerusalem, Mecca) show different weekly patterns corresponding to different days of rest. In China, no weekly pattern can be found. The presence of a weekly cycle in the measured tropospheric NO2 VCD may help to identify the different anthropogenic source categories. Furthermore, we estimated the lifetime of tropospheric NO2 by analysing the mean weekly cycle exemplarily over Germany, obtaining a value of about 6 h in summer and 18 - 24 h in winter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据