4.7 Article

The ε Chamaeleontis young stellar group and the characterization of sparse stellar clusters

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 599, 期 2, 页码 1207-1222

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/379365

关键词

binaries : visual; open clusters and associations : individual (Scorpius-Centaurus); stars : formation; stars : individual (epsilon Chamaeleontis, HD 104237); stars : pre-main-sequence; X-rays : stars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the outcomes of a Chandra X-Ray Observatory snapshot study of five nearby Herbig Ae/Be (HAeBe) stars that are kinematically linked with the Oph-Sco-Cen association (OSCA). Optical photometric and spectroscopic follow-up was conducted for the HD 104237 field. The principal result is the discovery of a compact group of pre-main-sequence (PMS) stars associated with HD 104237 and its codistant, comoving B9 neighbor epsilon Chamaeleontis AB. We name the group after the most massive member. The group has five confirmed stellar systems ranging from spectral type B9 to M5, including a remarkably high degree of multiplicity for HD 104237 itself. The HD 104237 system is at least a quintet, with four low-mass PMS companions in nonhierarchical orbits within a projected separation of 1500 AU of the HAeBe primary. Two of the low-mass members of the group are actively accreting classical T Tauri stars. The Chandra observations also increase the census of companions for two of the other four HAeBe stars, HD 141569 and HD 150193, and identify several additional new members of the OSCA. We discuss this work in light of several theoretical issues: the origin of X-rays from HAeBe stars; the uneventful dynamical history of the high-multiplicity HD 104237 system; and the origin of the epsilon Cha group and other OSCA outlying groups in the context of turbulent giant molecular clouds. Together with the similar eta Cha cluster, we paint a portrait of sparse stellar clusters dominated by intermediate-mass stars 5-10 Myr after their formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据