4.7 Article

A human synthetic combinatorial library of arrayable single-chain antibodies based on shuffling in vivo formed CDRs into general framework regions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 335, 期 1, 页码 177-192

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.053

关键词

arrayable scFvs; cellulose-binding domain; phage display; colony lift screen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe a novel approach for high-throughput screening of recombinant antibodies, based on their immobilization on solid cellulose-based supports. We constructed a large human synthetic single-chain Fv antibody library where in vivo formed complementarity determining regions were shuffled combinatorially onto germline-derived human variable-region frameworks. The arraying of library-derived scFvs was facilitated by our unique display/ expression system, where scFvs are expressed as fusion proteins with a cellulose-binding domain (CBD). Escherichia coli cells expressing library-derived scFv-CBDs are grown on a porous master filter on top of a second cellulose-based filter that captures the antibodies secreted by the bacteria. The cellulose filter is probed with labeled antigen allowing the identification of specific binders and the recovery of the original bacterial clones from the master filter. These filters may be simultaneously probed with a number of antigens allowing the isolation of a number of binding specificities and the validation of specificity of binders. We screened the library against a number of cancer-related peptides, proteins, and peptide-protein complexes and yielded antibody fragments exhibiting dissociation constants in the low nanomolar range. We expect our new antibody phage library to become a valuable source of antibodies to many different targets, and to play a vital role in facilitating high-throughput target discovery and validation in the area of functional cancer genomics. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据